«Воинствующая тенденция» национализма

Nationalism’s Militant Tendency

Источник: https://nickgriffin544956.substack.com/p/nationalisms-militant-tendency

I’m thinking seriously of changing the name of this Substack account to “Nick Griffin – I Told You So”. On top of my 22-year head-start on Rupert Lowe’s excellent work on the grooming issue, and my even longer record warning of the coming demographic disaster, predicting the 7/7 attacks, etc, etc, everyone can now see that I was right about Restore as well.

I said months ago that Rupert Lowe was a Tory posing as a nationalist. That in any straight contest with Reform where Lowe does not have a real pre-prepared support base, Restore will do little more than save their deposit. And that the team of young, highly educated (ex)Tory system apparatchiks he has running his head office are manipulative fakes who will turn out to be from the same stable as Douglas Murray and all the other neocon Zionists and homosexual intellectuals.

That last point I will prove to you here fairly soon. But, for now, the last few days have confirmed the first two. All the people who screamed about me for criticising the “Rupert Will Save Us” hysteria have gone strangely quiet. What’s up?

We’ve seen the result in Makerfield, where Mr. Lowe said repeatedly he believed Restore was going to win. Well, the 6.84% they took in the end didn’t even match the percentage or raw number secured by the BNP in the general election of 2010 (in which, let me remind folks, the BNP overall beat UKIP nationwide, despite all the BBC’s promotion of Farage).

We achieved that result with a no-frills campaign costing about £1,000 and with our brave little local team having no outside help, because we had none spare to give. Restore, by contrast, threw a big five-figure sum at Makerfield, plus more than 300 canvassers there every weekend, and a big team knocking doors during the weeks as well.

Their result was, in a word, disappointing. If the seat is fought again in a forthcoming general election, it will be even worse, because now everyone knows that the “we’re here to win” boast was a baseless lie. So most of them will vote Reform next time, in the hope that, now the good people of Makerfield have used Burnham to get rid of Starmer, they can go on to get rid of Burnham.

The Restore faithful’s new cope is that “we beat the Tories, the Lib Dems and the Greens, that’s a huge step forward for a new party”. Sorry, but it isn’t. It’s a sign of the readiness of many electors to vote tactically. LibDems and Greens voted Labour in Makerfield to stop Reform, just as Labour and LibDem voters in Gorton & Denton voted Green to keep out Reform. And Green and Labour voters all over southern England will vote LibDem to keep out Reform at the next general election.

The Tories were obliterated not by Lowe, but by all save their most braindead supporters voting Reform in the hope of beating Burnham. The fact that the Tories took more than half of all the votes cast in Aberdeen South on the same day showed that the Conservative party, while desperately unpopular in most places, is by no means dead yet.

A Labour victory in a snap general election (both entirely possible) would, sadly, put a future Tory revival on the cards. Reform and Restore are both one-man bands and hence inherently unstable and potentially short-lived. The Conservative party, by contrast, is an institution which has dodged and shape-shifted and kept itself alive for hundreds of years; the vile blue creature will not be buried for good for a long time to come.

The only good thing for Restore in Makerfield was that they managed to save their £500 deposit, but anti-immigration nationalists have been saving our deposits in by elections for more than fifty years. In Uxbridge (a West London constituency close to the Indian immigration ground zero of Southall) a by-election back in 1972, saw the then young National Front, fighting under the slogan “Keep Uxbridge White”, win 8.2% of the vote.

This thrashed the Mosleyite Union Movement, which only scraped 1.1%. The UM candidate, by the way, was ‘Big Dan’ Harmston, well-known as the fiery leader of the Smithfield meat porters who marched for Enoch Powell in 1968 after he was sacked by the Tories for his ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech.

More than fifty years - during which time immigration has gone from a local problem affecting a handful of constituencies, which Powell himself described in that speech as a “cloud no bigger than a man’s hand”, to an existential threat set to plunge us into minority status just 30 years from now.

More than fifty years of ceaseless anti-indigenous discrimination, gang rape, anti-white racist murders and repression. And still there are fools who claim that saving a deposit shows that they are on their way to saving the country at the next general election. I really do hate these bastards, and so should you, because their lies are giving good but naïve people false hope and so wasting their time, energy and money.

But for ethnonationalists holding Mr. Lowe out as their Great White Hope, things got even worse 24-hours later, when Rupert gave an interview to American commentator Brett Weinstein last weekend. Keen to display the ‘respectable’ credentials whose absence costs votes, Mr. Lowe told Mr. Weinstein that “I detest far-right ethno-nationalism and neo-Naziism.”

Cue anguished squeals and hysteria in the social media bubble of far-right Restore supporters!

Now, I too have a problem with neo-Nazism. Most of the actual neo-Nazi groups are controlled and funded by the Southern Poverty Law Center, Hope Not Hate and the security services. We see it most plainly in Ukraine, but it is clear that the CIA has spent a great deal of time and money shaping and weaponizing Satanic-influenced neo-Nazism everywhere else too.

Their Azovification trick is out of the same Deep State/neo-con playbook as the weaponisation of Wahhabism. Al Qaeda and ISIS are their controlled and useful idiot Islamists; Azov left-hand path Nazis in Ukraine and online are their controlled and useful idiot white nationalists.

Lowe’s conflation between these bought-and-paid-for neo-Nazi fakes and genuine ethnonationalism may have been an off-the-cuff remark, but the tactic is direct from the liberal/Zionist/Marxist/System playbook. It was first articulated by the British intelligence guru, General Sir Frank Kitson”, whose doctrine for Low Intensity Operations against troublesome nationalist opponents of the British state included the need to “pollute the water in which the fish swim.”

Nor was this the first time that Mr. Lowe’s personal opinions and actions had sent shivers down the spines of the ‘far-right’ commentators who a few months were so angry when I pointed out some of Restore’s most obvious weaknesses and the fact that Rupert may not be the best thing since sliced bread.

In an interview with The Spectator back in May, for example, he bemoaned the fact that “There was this spate of accusations of ethnonationalism and all this sort of rubbish.”

“You know I can’t and won’t audit who supports us,” he continued, “but I can assure you the actual structure of the party has none of that in it.”

Indeed it doesn’t, for the party machine is run by a group of young (ex) Tories with a neocon thinktank background which is fully in favour of mass immigration, just so long as the immigrants provide cheap labour, ‘integrate’, and aren’t mean to gays.

Lowe went on to make it clear that he does not believe in the deportation of “whole communities of British passport holders”. He concluded by telling the Spectator that Restore could win in Makerfield. That didn’t age well, did it?

Many more were angered by the temporary exclusion of the pretty influencer Saskia from Restore’s youth wing launch after she used the forbidden word, W**t* on X.

Then there was the little matter of his son’s wedding, his enthusiasm for his Libyan-heritage daughter-in-law and the halal food served at the reception. Great is the wailing and gnashing of teeth. At least, among those of them who actually have teeth.

To sum up where we are: There is a strong possibility that Any Burnham will call a snap election, in which the Restore vote will be squeezed by even ‘far-right’ voters holding their noses and voting Reform in a desperate attempt to prevent the unmitigated disaster of a far-left Labour-led regime in power until at least 2031, and then introducing a PR system in order to keep the left in control until at least 2036.

Whenever the election is, the nearer it gets the more the left and the MSM will ‘expose’ various ‘far-right’ figures in Restore. Rupert Lowe will respond to this either by expelling the most controversial, or by making statements against the deportation of ‘legal immigrants who pay their way’, and in favour of Israel, in the well-founded hope that many of the reputationally most challenging individuals will resign and save him the trouble of kicking them out.

Griffin’s Militant Tendency So now I’m going to surprise a lot of people: All ethno-nationalists should join Restore. Those already in the party should not resign, while those who past statements make them potential targets for expulsion should make excuses, take their ‘hardline’ badges off their sleeves and do whatever is necessary to remain inside the tent.

Because, and here’s the key point, it’s a very big tent. And it’s filled with about 130,000 people. Nearly all of them decent, new-to-politics, rather naïve but enthusiastic patriots who just want to “do something to save our country”. By way of comparison, that is ten times the number of members that the BNP had at its peak, and with that number we built the machine and the political insurgency which broke the logjam of British politics and kickstarted the historical process we see unfolding today.

Imagine what Nick Griffin and the BNP would have done with 130,000 members and the £2 million a year in membership fees alone which Mr. Lowe now has at his disposal.

Yes, of course the failure in Makerfield and Mr. Lowe’s avowedly civic nationalist stance has alarmed people, particularly those who had been most ready to believe that Restore was going to be the rapid answer to their prayers.

But here’s the thing that nationalists need to get their heads around – it doesn’t matter. What matters in the real world, rather than in the often daft perfectionalism that blights most radical movements, including nationalism, is that Restore is the biggest ready-made recruitment pool which British nationalists have ever had.

The situation is reminiscent of the way in which the grass-roots Powellite movement of the late 1960s (and the Conservative Monday Club which also gained size and confidence from Powell’s speech) were exploited by the National Front. The success of the NF in the mid-seventies didn’t come from nowhere, it was the result of patient and relentless organisation-building, and working hand-and-glove with the Powellites and Monday Clubbers was part of that work, since many of them ended up joining the Front.

As already noted, regardless of Restore’s electoral potential or lack thereof, Lowe’s party is ten times bigger than the BNP at its peak. If it was a ruthlessly run, highly centralised body, in which local units and activities were controlled by a network of full-time staffers appointed and paid by a hands-on central team, the situation would be harder to exploit.

But Restore isn’t like that at all. The structure isn’t hostile to serious nationalist involvement, not least because - at present at least – there is no real structure, there is just a bunch of young tory toffs. True, they were groomed by Peter Whittle and the New Culture Forum, and their very obvious role is to keep things on the free market straight and narrow (indeed, the whispers in Westminster is that the whole operation is essentially a Tory scam against Farage).

But none of that matters. Not because Restore is going to come to power and sort everything, because it isn’t, and because ‘sorting’ it is effectively impossible. Even to attempt it would require the end of fiat money banking, the radical restructuring of the capitalist system and a decades-long suppression of the elderly majority in favour of ruthless pro-natalism. That’s three whole revolutions on that initial list alone, on top of which there’s the little matter of fighting and winning the civil war which would be required before “deporting” any more than a few thousand particularly badly behaved illegals.

Nationalism is about the nation and its people. A nationalist activist is there to serve the nation, generally by helping and educating its people. Nationalism is about long-termism, it holds that each generation is merely the link in the chain between our glorious past and our inevitable eventual revival in the future.

To do that there must be organisations and people-level institutions; structures and traditions which transcend generations. To build those you need recruits. Restore has already collected several hundred potential recruits for these desperately needed bodies in every largely working-class constituency in Britain.

To look at the most drastic issue on the horizon: Nature and the spirit of the times are leading us to Balkanisation. The counter-jihadists, the US Deep State and the anti-white bigotry of our ruling political elite are pushing us towards civil war.

Our people are totally unequipped for either minority status or civil war. Our core mission as nationalists is to provide the leadership and examples they need. I reiterate what I have said and written many times before, I am not talking here about weapons or military training. They will be found once they are needed, and those who want war will make sure that our people get them.

Just as they will make sure the other side get them too, because that is in their playbook, just look at how the CIA ripped apart the former Yugoslavia. Their narco-jihad gangster regime in Kosovo, working through the Albanian diaspora, will be the mirror gun-running image of their neo-Nazi Ukrainian exiles network who will supply the European and British side. Don’t worry about the weapons, there’ll be plenty for everyone. That’s part of the evil of the plan.

If, by some near miracle, the monsters trying to push us into civil war fail, then the alternative will still involve more of what our people have suffered for decades. It will still see more streets, more suburbs, more whole towns, where we cease to be the majority not in 2060, but next year, the year after, or in five years’ time. It will involve more LGBTQ and leftist indoctrination and tyranny. More attacks on our identity and freedom.

We still, therefore, need to build structures which protect our people, which bring our communities together, which give us the power to insist upon our rights, to cause very significant problems for anyone who refuses to grant them, and to use every victory or even every unjust rebuff to bring more of our people consciously into our tribe.

The need is there. The blueprints for the structures are there. All sorts of experiments have been carried out and the lessons are just waiting to be applied. Indeed, in more and more areas and in many different fields, nationalist, traditionalist and Christian activists (and, to be fair, a few European pagan ones) are already turning theory into successful practice.

All that is needed to speed this process up enormously is new activists. A lot of money would help, of course, and if Mr. Lowe – perhaps after the electoral bruising coming his way if there is a snap election – would throw his resources into this then he could duplicate his grass-roots Great Yarmouth success in at least a dozen regional powerbases.

These would become beacons of example, training centres, poles of attraction and living demonstrations of organisational and moral superiority over Reform. If by chance public fear of Labour did put Reform in power, then such a solid base would allow Lowe to hold Farage’s feet to fire. Defections to, and wins for, Restore would follow as Farage let his voters down.

To be brutally honest, I this is very unlikely, because I am talking about building a network of grass-roots organisations which would, taken together, be a movement for National Revolution. And, quite simply. Rupert Lowe is an elderly capitalist with civic nationalist patriotism.

At any time in British history prior to the 1960s, that would have put him in the centre of the Conservative party, not even on its right. He may well be a far better man than any of the other creeps, perverts and crooks in Parliament, but he is not a revolutionary.

So he won’t do those things. He – or rather the Gatestone Institute/Henry Jackson Society Toryboys to whom he has entrusted his central organisation – may even decide to expel people they catch working to turn their activists into amateur election fighters into professional community activists.

But they won’t spot them all. They won’t expel them all. There are not going to be membership cards or any sort of central command structure. I am merely providing the ideas and the early blueprints, then it’s “let a thousand flowers bloom”. Some of the initiatives I’m proposing are so obviously beneficial to a would-be insurgent political party that they may even be happy to let them run.

If you want to put a label on it; if you want to see a precedent for what I am proposing, then you need only to look to the other end of the British political spectrum. In 1964 the Trotskyite Revolutionary Socialist Lague launched a newspaper, Militant. Throughout the 1970s and ’80s, Militant formed the basis of a concerted campaign of Marxist entryism into the Labour Party. This culminated in the election of a number of Militant members as MPs, the capture of Labour’s youth organisation and Militant taking over Liverpool council. Its leader, Derek Hatton, famously said that ten Liverpools would make the British Revolution.

The fact that leading Militant Tendency members were purged from Labour in the late eighties and, in any case, their aim from beginning to end was political, rather than grassroots community building, does not invalidate the comparison.

The important point is that the process involves people with a very firm ideological line and militant set of objectives taking advantage of a much larger but far softer organisation built by someone else (although their efforts once inside it do help to build it as well). It is about adopting a policy of entryism, joining not because they agree with its current leadership or think that it is going to change the world, but because it gives them access to the potential recruits they need to change their town, and in due course to help to change their ountry for th.

Right now, Restore provides the best target for such an operation which the British ‘far-right’ has ever been offered. So, stay in it, or join it! Having done so, however, kindly don’t sit there thinking just reposting Rupert Lowe on X, or paying £20 a year, is going to achieve anything. You’ve got to get in there and graft.

Unless something drastic crops up I won’t post tomorrow. I’ve got some other very important things to get on with, and my defence against the Campaign Against AntiSemitism’s attempt to get me thrown in prison is taking up a lot of time. But I reckon there’s plenty to think about in this essay. If you agree, then please take half an hour to post links to it all over social media platforms used by Restore supporters and British nationalists. Let’s get Griffin’s Militant Tendency on the road. There’s a long way to go!